<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: God bless you, lucky home owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/</link>
	<description>the struggle of memory against forgetting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lakesha</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lakesha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great inghsit. Relieved I&#039;m on the same side as you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great inghsit. Relieved I&#8217;m on the same side as you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chance</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer the idea of co-operative housing. CDS have a great working model called Mutual Home Ownership, where the society builds the homes and members gradually buy up equity to service the corporate mortgage according to their income, then cash out when they leave. Have a look - 

It would be fab if the Government and our Mayor decided to just make a big switch to that sort of model. Failing that, yes I agree - more council housing and more intermediate housing. The idea that over half of all new housing will be straightforward private housing is nuts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the idea of co-operative housing. CDS have a great working model called Mutual Home Ownership, where the society builds the homes and members gradually buy up equity to service the corporate mortgage according to their income, then cash out when they leave. Have a look &#8211; </p>
<p>It would be fab if the Government and our Mayor decided to just make a big switch to that sort of model. Failing that, yes I agree &#8211; more council housing and more intermediate housing. The idea that over half of all new housing will be straightforward private housing is nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rent from the Council. Oh, yes, that&#039;s not an option any more is it? 

Council housing was originally intended to offer safety for tennants from the whims of private landlords. Building council houses was not soley intended to house the pooer. 

Housing associations should offer an alternative and I have friends who have lived in housing assocs for over a decade, quite securely and without unfair price hikes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rent from the Council. Oh, yes, that&#8217;s not an option any more is it? </p>
<p>Council housing was originally intended to offer safety for tennants from the whims of private landlords. Building council houses was not soley intended to house the pooer. </p>
<p>Housing associations should offer an alternative and I have friends who have lived in housing assocs for over a decade, quite securely and without unfair price hikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A dangerous and remarkable delusion &#171; tom&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A dangerous and remarkable delusion &#171; tom&#39;s blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Philosophy &amp;&#160;politics     &#171; God bless you, lucky home&#160;owners [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Philosophy &amp;&nbsp;politics     &laquo; God bless you, lucky home&nbsp;owners [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how long before it hits a &#039;tipping point&#039; and that there are more votes to be had by stabalising or reducing house prices than there are by increasing them..?

The trouble is is within any industry the more senior managers tend to be older (unsurprisingly). This means that they are more likely to have got on the property ladder before prices trippled. In journalism this manifests itself as a complete focus on house price growth being good. While I can detect a sense of youth discontent about house prices the focus seems to be directed at finding an increasingly desperate ways to get on to the property ladder. People don&#039;t seem to realise that government policy bears a significant level of responsibility for the problem and there seems to be a &#039;missing movement&#039; that could tap into this frustration. For example, I&#039;ve not seen any political party whose highlighted a comittment to stabalising house prices at around 5 times an average persons salary.

This lack of consideration leaves the disenfranchised 20 to 30 somethings in a bit of a quandry? In the absence of representation on a political scale what do you do?

1) Continue to rent in private accomodation - Historically buying property was seen to be a way of putting a bit a way for your old age; after you finished paying off your mortgage you shelter is effectively &#039;free&#039; and so you can focus on paying for other things. Relying on rented accomodation would mean forgoing this goal.

2) Save up and buy a house at current prices - Perhaps a slightly better option than the one above but it still changes the lifetime earning profile of a family. If you don&#039;t get onto the ladder until your mid thirties and never finish paying the mortgage off then your ability to save for a pension is severely circumscribed. 

3) Emigrate abroad. Apparently you can buy a nice detached house in California for about $80,000. They have better weather too. Still seems pretty drastic though!

Any other ideas?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how long before it hits a &#8216;tipping point&#8217; and that there are more votes to be had by stabalising or reducing house prices than there are by increasing them..?</p>
<p>The trouble is is within any industry the more senior managers tend to be older (unsurprisingly). This means that they are more likely to have got on the property ladder before prices trippled. In journalism this manifests itself as a complete focus on house price growth being good. While I can detect a sense of youth discontent about house prices the focus seems to be directed at finding an increasingly desperate ways to get on to the property ladder. People don&#8217;t seem to realise that government policy bears a significant level of responsibility for the problem and there seems to be a &#8216;missing movement&#8217; that could tap into this frustration. For example, I&#8217;ve not seen any political party whose highlighted a comittment to stabalising house prices at around 5 times an average persons salary.</p>
<p>This lack of consideration leaves the disenfranchised 20 to 30 somethings in a bit of a quandry? In the absence of representation on a political scale what do you do?</p>
<p>1) Continue to rent in private accomodation &#8211; Historically buying property was seen to be a way of putting a bit a way for your old age; after you finished paying off your mortgage you shelter is effectively &#8216;free&#8217; and so you can focus on paying for other things. Relying on rented accomodation would mean forgoing this goal.</p>
<p>2) Save up and buy a house at current prices &#8211; Perhaps a slightly better option than the one above but it still changes the lifetime earning profile of a family. If you don&#8217;t get onto the ladder until your mid thirties and never finish paying the mortgage off then your ability to save for a pension is severely circumscribed. </p>
<p>3) Emigrate abroad. Apparently you can buy a nice detached house in California for about $80,000. They have better weather too. Still seems pretty drastic though!</p>
<p>Any other ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention God bless you, lucky home owners « tom's blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/12/22/god-bless-you-lucky-home-owners/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention God bless you, lucky home owners « tom's blog -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tom.acrewoods.net/?p=146#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by GreenFeed, Tom Chance. Tom Chance said: Funny how journalists &amp; commentators almost always celebrate the return of above-income-inflation house price rises! http://bit.ly/6vIfpe [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by GreenFeed, Tom Chance. Tom Chance said: Funny how journalists &amp; commentators almost always celebrate the return of above-income-inflation house price rises! <a href="http://bit.ly/6vIfpe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/6vIfpe</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

