<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Southwark fudges the Sustainable Communities Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/</link>
	<description>the struggle of memory against forgetting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power to the people! &#171; tom&#39;s blog</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Power to the people! &#171; tom&#39;s blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] budgeting, made fun by the unsurpassably brilliant The People Speak, or really make the most of the Sustainable Communities Act. But what about the people [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] budgeting, made fun by the unsurpassably brilliant The People Speak, or really make the most of the Sustainable Communities Act. But what about the people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eileen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next meeting of the active citizens&#039; review of the SCA is on Monday 14th September 6.30pm-8.30pm at Keyworth Centre, LSBU, Elephant &amp; Castle. Please email SCA@nutbrook.demon.co.uk to ask for venue details and to say you are coming!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next meeting of the active citizens&#8217; review of the SCA is on Monday 14th September 6.30pm-8.30pm at Keyworth Centre, LSBU, Elephant &amp; Castle. Please email <a href="mailto:SCA@nutbrook.demon.co.uk">SCA@nutbrook.demon.co.uk</a> to ask for venue details and to say you are coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilian</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lilian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for that, tom, here&#039;s a reminder for all you out there - a group of local communities is having a meeting on 14th september to work out exactly what can be done, so please let us know what you think, the link again is http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthwark.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=123:sca-what-now&amp;catid=4:news&amp;Itemid=3

thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for that, tom, here&#8217;s a reminder for all you out there &#8211; a group of local communities is having a meeting on 14th september to work out exactly what can be done, so please let us know what you think, the link again is <a href="http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthwark.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=123:sca-what-now&#038;catid=4:news&#038;Itemid=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthwark.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=123:sca-what-now&#038;catid=4:news&#038;Itemid=3</a></p>
<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secertary of State has the power to send the council&#039;s proposals back and have them start the procedure again - the problem with this is how does the &lt;cite&gt;community&lt;/cite&gt; get the Secretary to do this?
There&#039;ll be a survey on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peoplesrepubilicofsouthwark.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;People&#039;s Republic of Southwark&lt;/a&gt; hopefully later today, suggestions for questions to &lt;a&gt;Liliana&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Secertary of State has the power to send the council&#8217;s proposals back and have them start the procedure again &#8211; the problem with this is how does the <cite>community</cite> get the Secretary to do this?<br />
There&#8217;ll be a survey on <a href="http://www.peoplesrepubilicofsouthwark.co.uk" rel="nofollow">People&#8217;s Republic of Southwark</a> hopefully later today, suggestions for questions to <a>Liliana</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Chance</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Chance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to be doing exactly that over the next month. I&#039;m looking for particularly good case studies so that we can both demonstrate our process is reasonable and put Southwark council officers in touch with those councils that did it well.

Thanks for the thoughts from Lewisham, it certainly sounds a lot more positive!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be doing exactly that over the next month. I&#8217;m looking for particularly good case studies so that we can both demonstrate our process is reasonable and put Southwark council officers in touch with those councils that did it well.</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughts from Lewisham, it certainly sounds a lot more positive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://tom.acrewoods.net/2009/08/13/southwark-fudges-the-sustainable-communities-act/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomchance.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it would be worth comparing notes on what happened it Lewisham and Southwark so both boroughs can improve things next time? I thought the citizens&#039; panel itself was reasonably well-organised in Lewisham (though the people on the panel rejected my proposal!), but that much more could have been done in the months before to let local people know about the act and how to suggest proposals. Lewisham also rejected a lot of proposals that didn&#039;t meet the criteria, but the positive thing about this was because in most cases it was because the Council already had the power to implement the proposals. So now campaigners can start asking questions about why the Council isn&#039;t using some of its powers etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it would be worth comparing notes on what happened it Lewisham and Southwark so both boroughs can improve things next time? I thought the citizens&#8217; panel itself was reasonably well-organised in Lewisham (though the people on the panel rejected my proposal!), but that much more could have been done in the months before to let local people know about the act and how to suggest proposals. Lewisham also rejected a lot of proposals that didn&#8217;t meet the criteria, but the positive thing about this was because in most cases it was because the Council already had the power to implement the proposals. So now campaigners can start asking questions about why the Council isn&#8217;t using some of its powers etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

